Montrealers fleeced for years: Desrosiers

Posted By: Canadian Press · 2/25/2013 12:16:00 PM

The Charbonneau Commission inquiry is hearing that there were warning signs for over a decade that Montreal was significantly over-paying for public construction projects.

An investigator who analyzed internal city reports says officials did little to stem the tide.

The analysis is being presented today as the corruption inquiry gets set to hear from a number of former top city officials this week about the higher cost of infrastructure projects.

An inquiry investigator has testified that between 1997 and 2010, there were multiple reports that project costs soared in Montreal, with no mechanisms in place to stop collusion.

One 2009 report revealed that sewer and water pipe projects cost 85.5 per cent more in Montreal, compared to the rest of the province.

Inquiry investigator Guy Desrosiers, an accountant by trade, testified that numerous studies over the years triggered alarm bells about the concentration of companies winning contracts, and about cost overruns.

Among the elements Desrosiers has keyed in on is the lack of competition. A 2006 report noted that the City of Montreal received generally five or six bids for certain jobs, while a significantly smaller city, Quebec, would typically have a dozen.

Problems in the management and awarding of public contracts in Montreal were highlighted in a 1997 report by the city auditor.

But Desrosiers says nothing happened following the reports.

Photo: via La Presse

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. Joe posted on 02/25/2013 03:25 PM
    It is starting to look like tremblay is not as lily white as he made himself out to be. He was mayor and did nothing. He may say he knew nothing but being at the top and saying that does not fly. He is supposed to be aware of what is going on.
showing all comments

News

You are seeing the 2 most recent blog posts.

News Videos

Note about comments: Comments will not appear immediately after posting. Comments containing links or vulgar language and comments that are racist, sexist or offensive will not be approved.