Sharp words for MUHC brass

Posted By: Patrick Lejtenyi · 3/4/2013 8:54:00 PM

With an expected $45-million deficit next year and the future of the Lachine hospital still in doubt, audience members at the MUHC's board of governors meeting were loudly dissatisfied with the project's top brass.

Former Montreal Children's board member Geoffrey Chambers says stakeholders, including unions, practicing doctors and other ex-board members, are seriously disturbed by the superhospital's sloppy management and lack of transparency.

He and others believe the ongoing controversies surrounding the MUHC is making life difficult and stressful for the hospital's workers.

"There's a case being made by the government that it's financially less well managed than other hospitals, and we haven't answered that case well at all," he charged.

The project has been dogged by controversy for years, with its former boss Arthur Porter now the subject of an arrest warrant.

Photo:  Patrick Lejtenyi

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. Campbell Hendery posted on 03/05/2013 12:05 AM
    The lack of transparency is beyond the pale. My family has been associated with the MGH for over 100 years. I assure you Arthur Porter is only symptomatic of a deeper problem.
    Normand Rinfret is in no way fit to run this thing.'Knew or should have known". The rot is on Guy Street. By the by, no one has factored in what it's going to cost to retro fit the MGH. Elsie Angus & Eric Reford, Lord Strathcona's heirs by stirpes have behaved with magananimity but the Vic's Charter is inviolate. At law they would receive land if Trust is broken. They don't want the land they want Vic used in some medical capacity.Rinfret must go and the Board must behave in open transparent manner. Sorry for typos
showing all comments

News

You are seeing the 2 most recent blog posts.

News Videos

News Audio

Note about comments: Comments will not appear immediately after posting. Comments containing links or vulgar language and comments that are racist, sexist or offensive will not be approved.