Tony Accurso loses another round in court

Appeals court ruling brings him one step closer to having to testify at Charbonneau

Tony Accurso has lost another round in his bid to avoid having to testify before the Charbonneau Commission.

The Quebec Court of Appeal has rejected the construction boss' latest attempt to dodge having to go before the Commission.

Accurso was subpoenaed a year ago, but has spent that time in the courts, launching several legal challenges.

Accurso is facing criminal charges, including tax fraud, and charges relating to several municipal contracts. His name has come up routinely at the Commission's hearings, and many politicians and civil servants have been photographed on his former yacht The Touch.

He suggests being forced to testify at the Commission's hearings might put him in a compromising position.

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. ric posted on 06/03/2014 05:06 PM
    Hey Tony, it's fun scamming money from everyone but not so much fun getting caught!
showing all comments

Share this article:

News Videos



Latest News

  • Canadiens' Kassian enters rehab program after early morning crash

    Montreal Canadiens forward Zack Kassian has entered a substance abuse program after being involved in a motor vehicle accident, the NHL and the NHL Players Association announced Monday. Read More
  • Niqab: Harper government loses again in court

    A new court ruling means a devout Muslim woman who chooses to cover her face now has a chance to become a Canadian and vote in the Oct. 19 federal election.

    The Federal Court of Appeal rejected Monday a government request to put a recent decision in favour of Zunera Ishaq on hold while Ottawa seeks a hearing in the Supreme Court of Canada.

    Justice Johanne Trudel dismissed the government's application for a stay of a Sept. 15 decision that affirmed the unlawfulness of a federal rule prohibiting a niqab at a citizenship ceremony.

    Ishaq, 29, came to Ontario from Pakistan in 2008. She refused to take part in a citizenship ceremony because she would have to show her face due to a December 2011 policy requiring candidates who wear full or partial face coverings to remove them during recitation of the oath.

    The Federal Court of Canada found the rule unlawful in February and the Court of Appeal recently upheld the decision. A three-judge panel ruled from the bench immediately after a hearing, saying they wanted Ishaq to obtain citizenship in time to vote.

    On Monday, Trudel said she could not agree to the federal request for a stay of the appeal court's mid-September ruling.

    "I find that the appellant has not demonstrated that refusing his application for stay would result in irreparable harm to the public interest," she wrote. "This suffices to dispose of the appellant’s motion for stay."

    In a statement released Monday night, Ishaq said she was pleased the courts have reaffirmed her right to citizenship and to vote.

    Ishaq also said she was disappointed with the government's focus on her case "when there is so much more that merits the attention of Canadians at this time."

    "I'm also disappointed that Mr. Harper continually twists the facts of my case for his gain," she said.

    "I wish to confirm that I will be identified without my veil for the purposes of the ceremony. This has nothing to do with identity and everything to do with my right — and the right of all Canadians — to think, believe and dress without government interference."

    The issue of face coverings at citizenship ceremonies has become a highly divisive one on the federal election trail, generating sparks in two French-language debates.

    The Conservatives argue it is essential — and consistent with national values — to show one's face at the very moment of becoming a Canadian citizen.

    "We are disappointed in the court's decision, especially as we were waiting on the Supreme Court to hear our appeal," Conservative spokesman Stephen Lecce said in a statement.

    "We have committed to rectifying this matter going forward by introducing legislation that will require one to show their face while swearing the oath of citizenship."

    The NDP and Liberals have accused the government of using the issue, which affects only a small number of women, as a means of distracting voters from more important issues like the economy.

    Critics of the federal stance note all new citizens must show their face as proof of identity before becoming a Canadian and that the government should not tell them what they can wear during the actual ceremony.

    Read More