No bail for cop shooter who breached release conditions

Walter Filipas was one of the two people shot by Claude Forget in 1993

A Montreal man who spent 20 years in prison for trying to kill two police officers will have to return behind bars pending sentencing for breach of conditions.

Claude Forget claims he forgot to check in with police one week last month, one of the conditions of his release from prison back in April. Forget did report to police the week after and that's when he was arrested.

Forget, 58, was sent to prison for the attempted murder of Montreal police constables Walter Filipas and Lucy Krasowski in May 1993. He had also been convicted of several armed robberies prior to that.

Quebec Court Judge Geneviève Gratton took into consideration Forget was respecting all his conditions since his release and even reported to police and signed a registry the week after the missed date. She also noted that he was trying to reinsert himself back into society by looking for work and that his father and a potential employer were willing to put up bail money.

But Gratton also took into consideration the violent nature of Forget's crimes and reasoned that his detention was necessary to protect the security of the public as well as Forget's victims and witnesses.

Gratton also cited the "generosity" of the crown in coming up with the series of release conditions and that the non-respect of the conditions translates into a breach of confidence in the justice system.

"When it's a breach of condition from a promise made by the accused to the court, it cannot be said that it's a minor breach," crown prosecutor François Allard told CJAD 800 News.

Forget, wearing a worn navy sweatshirt and grey sweatpants, looked at the floor most of the time as the judge read out her ruling and when she finished, he looked up, appearing resigned.

Forget will be transferred this week to Drummondville where he served his sentence for a decision on a peace bond. The Montreal case returns to court next week.

Leave a comment:

· Subscribe to comments
Be the first to comment here. You DO NOT need to be a member to comment.

Share this article:

News Videos



Latest News

  • Canadiens' Kassian enters rehab program after early morning crash

    Montreal Canadiens forward Zack Kassian has entered a substance abuse program after being involved in a motor vehicle accident, the NHL and the NHL Players Association announced Monday. Read More
  • Niqab: Harper government loses again in court

    A new court ruling means a devout Muslim woman who chooses to cover her face now has a chance to become a Canadian and vote in the Oct. 19 federal election.

    The Federal Court of Appeal rejected Monday a government request to put a recent decision in favour of Zunera Ishaq on hold while Ottawa seeks a hearing in the Supreme Court of Canada.

    Justice Johanne Trudel dismissed the government's application for a stay of a Sept. 15 decision that affirmed the unlawfulness of a federal rule prohibiting a niqab at a citizenship ceremony.

    Ishaq, 29, came to Ontario from Pakistan in 2008. She refused to take part in a citizenship ceremony because she would have to show her face due to a December 2011 policy requiring candidates who wear full or partial face coverings to remove them during recitation of the oath.

    The Federal Court of Canada found the rule unlawful in February and the Court of Appeal recently upheld the decision. A three-judge panel ruled from the bench immediately after a hearing, saying they wanted Ishaq to obtain citizenship in time to vote.

    On Monday, Trudel said she could not agree to the federal request for a stay of the appeal court's mid-September ruling.

    "I find that the appellant has not demonstrated that refusing his application for stay would result in irreparable harm to the public interest," she wrote. "This suffices to dispose of the appellant’s motion for stay."

    In a statement released Monday night, Ishaq said she was pleased the courts have reaffirmed her right to citizenship and to vote.

    Ishaq also said she was disappointed with the government's focus on her case "when there is so much more that merits the attention of Canadians at this time."

    "I'm also disappointed that Mr. Harper continually twists the facts of my case for his gain," she said.

    "I wish to confirm that I will be identified without my veil for the purposes of the ceremony. This has nothing to do with identity and everything to do with my right — and the right of all Canadians — to think, believe and dress without government interference."

    The issue of face coverings at citizenship ceremonies has become a highly divisive one on the federal election trail, generating sparks in two French-language debates.

    The Conservatives argue it is essential — and consistent with national values — to show one's face at the very moment of becoming a Canadian citizen.

    "We are disappointed in the court's decision, especially as we were waiting on the Supreme Court to hear our appeal," Conservative spokesman Stephen Lecce said in a statement.

    "We have committed to rectifying this matter going forward by introducing legislation that will require one to show their face while swearing the oath of citizenship."

    The NDP and Liberals have accused the government of using the issue, which affects only a small number of women, as a means of distracting voters from more important issues like the economy.

    Critics of the federal stance note all new citizens must show their face as proof of identity before becoming a Canadian and that the government should not tell them what they can wear during the actual ceremony.

    Read More